FORTUNE -- Dear Annie: I'm in my first job as a manager and have never hired anyone before, so I hope this isn't a dumb question. How can I get references to tell me more than the corporate equivalent of name, rank, and serial number? I'm looking at three candidates whose credentials and experience are all equally impressive, so I was hoping that references would serve as a tie-breaker. But everyone I've called so far has been very correct and conscientious about observing their companies' policies against commenting on anything useful -- such as, for example, what the candidate is like to work with on a daily basis.
Our HR department is no help (I suspect because our company has the same kind of no-comment policy), and hiring a professional reference-checking service isn't in the budget. Any suggestions about how to deal with this? — Hitting a Brick Wall
Dear HBW: It's not a dumb question at all. "The biggest mistake most hiring managers make is asking a candidate for three references, and then calling those three people and having totally meaningless conversations," says Greg Moran.
A former recruiter who "got very frustrated trying to check references," he says, Moran is now president and CEO of Chequed.com, a company based in Saratoga Springs, N.Y., that markets software aimed at making the process more efficient for big clients like Disney (DIS).
Where do you start? First, instead of asking for the usual three references, ask for five (more in a minute about why). At the same time, request that all five be former or current peers, bosses, or subordinates, not human resources staffers. "You want to speak with people who worked with this person on a day-to-day basis," Moran says. More
|Regulators pave way for Internet "fast lane" with net neutrality rules|
|What stumps Warren Buffett? Minimum wage|
|Analysts offer no apologies for missing Apple's Q2 2014 earnings beat|
|Facebook profit triples on mobile growth|
|Apple reports its quarterly earnings for fiscal Q2 2014|