FORTUNE -- J.P. Morgan Chase, the nation's largest bank, is set to pay the government a reported $13 billion to end a wave of civil investigations into the bank's sale of mortgage-backed securities leading up to the 2008 financial crisis.
But even the largest settlement ever paid by an American corporation won't sink CEO Jamie Dimon. A buoyant share price makes for a good lifesaver.
News of the astronomical settlement prompted calls for Dimon, long seen as Wall Street's golden boy, to finally -- finally! -- meet the fate of disgraced bank CEOs like Ken Lewis of Bank of America (BAC) and Charles O. Prince, head of Citigroup (C), who lost their posts during the recession.
Not so fast.
When Lewis resigned from BofA in September 2009, his bank's share price was $16.92, down from a high of $54.85 in 2006.
Meanwhile, J.P. Morgan (JPM) has never made more money. Dimon navigated the bank through the financial crisis without a loss and produced record profits for three straight years, reaching $21.3 billion in 2012. Its share price rose even as news of the giant settlement spread. On Tuesday it was at $54.52, near its 52-week high.
Like it or not, money talks and in Dimon's case, it speaks louder than what a settlement -- even one of historic proportions -- might say about the bank's recession-era screw-ups.
Just ask J.P. Morgan's shareholders -- the ones who stand to profit from the bank's financial success and have a say in its leadership. In May, amid ongoing federal investigations and the London Whale scandal that lost the bank $6.2 billion, nearly 70% of the bank's shareholders supported Dimon's dual role as J.P. Morgan's chairman and chief executive. The board of directors supported Dimon too. (Pension funds sought to remove Dimon as chairman in hopes of implementing what they considered better oversight.)
That backing is unlikely to waver. "[The settlement] will not have an impact on [Dimon's] ability to lead this company," says Jason Goldberg, managing director at Barclays Capital. "They're paying a big number to put this behind, and the board has chosen to embrace it."
Perhaps shareholders are supportive of Dimon because he has no obvious successor. It just so happens that a handful of top executives -- some with ties to the London Whale debacle -- departed the bank earlier this year, leaving Dimon, for better or worse, alone to lead.
Being alone at the top comes with its disadvantages. Despite the fact that some 80% of the securities in the recent settlement relate to activities at Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual -- which JP Morgan acquired during the financial crisis -- blame for the bank's legal woes has landed squarely on Dimon.
But it doesn't look like the pressure is getting to Dimon. Earlier this month, he announced the bank had set aside $23 billion for legal costs, making the $13 billion settlement look almost like a bargain.
Since the recession, Dimon had been a pillar of resolve inside J.P. Morgan and extremely popular in the outside world -- in Washington in particular, says Yale School of Management professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld. Dimon met regularly with Obama Administration officials and supported some of their financial reforms. "By standing apart from the crowd," Sonnenfeld says, "[Dimon] made a target of himself."
The recent legal tangles have lost Dimon favor in D.C., but it won't cost him his job. In a market where money is the only measure that matters, Dimon is still untouchable.
Companies can now do more with less, says a new study, for a surprising reason: The least productive workers stepped up their game.Anne Fisher, contributor - Oct 3, 2013 12:23 PM ET
We're not living in ordinary economic times. Every company needs to determine if its strategy requires an overhaul or just thoughtful tweaks. Here's how to start.
By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large
FORTUNE -- Remember when Motorola (MMI) ruled the mobile phone business worldwide? And then Nokia (NOK) did? And then BlackBerry (RIMM) did? And now none of them do? As Fortune headlined a recent BlackBerry article, "What the Hell Happened?"
We all MORESep 4, 2012 5:00 AM ET
If the downturn is receding, why is my mood indigo?
By Stanley Bing
FORTUNE -- Spring has sprung. The grass is riz. So it's reasonable to ask where the birdies is. Because I don't know about you, but I don't see no birdies. I'm tense. I'm nervous. I guess you could say that my consumer confidence is sort of ... leaky. Why should that be? All signs point to a slow MOREMay 2, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Opening the managerial toolbox from the 2008 recession to tackle today's economic turmoil will only get you into trouble. That's because the critical elements that affect companies are sharply different today. By Geoff ColvinAug 15, 2011 5:00 AM ET
Writing a check for a soccer uniform, I thought, Gee, when I was a kid, my school had money for that.
Most of the time I feel okay with the way things are going. I'm not part of the half of our nation that seems to think everything is heading to hell in a handcart. But sometimes I get grossed out by wild discrepancies. A sense of dislocation overwhelms me, and MOREBing - Nov 12, 2010 11:44 AM ET
I had to laugh the other day at the way the Market is behaving, but it wasn't a good laugh. It was one of those dark laughs, full of phlegm and bile, a laugh that dies in the back of your throat, turning before it fades away entirely into a short, sharp growl.
One day up. Two days up. Then down, down 150 or 200 points. It's like psychoanalysis. Two steps forward. MOREBing - Aug 19, 2010 1:31 PM ET
Just a little note to get the summer started off right. I have noticed a disturbing, post-recessionary trend developing that should, I believe, be killed in its cradle.
It's the uncatered meeting that takes place during what in civilized societies would be considered lunchtime.
When I was a lad, I worked for a guy I'll call Walt. Walt was a wonderful guy, except he had one (well, actually more than one, but MOREBing - Jun 1, 2010 11:56 AM ET
According to a new survey conducted in late January by Charles Schwab, 85% of all independent advisors believe that the recession will be over in a couple of years. Two or so, they think. Perhaps a little more. Or less.
Some believe that it will be over by the end of this year, but not many.
Others think it's going to be bad until late 2011, although they are in the minority, MOREBing - Mar 4, 2009 1:41 PM ET
Everywhere you look: gloom. But maybe not.
Gloom, of course, isn't hard to spot. The other day I looked outside my office window, which fortunately, the way things are going some days, is hermetically sealed and made out of extremely strong plate glass. Outside on the sidewalk, on the other side of the avenue, was a long, long line of people that grew as the morning progressed. By 10 AM, it was tripled MOREBing - Feb 27, 2009 9:32 AM ET
|Delinquent IRS employees paid bonuses by the agency|
|Students cry foul over athletes unionizing|
|Is capitalism driving itself out of business?|
|Sandy Hook victim's grandfather launches smart gun campaign|
|Court quizzes Aereo: Do TV streams break the law?|