FORTUNE -- Early last year, you might recall, Target found itself at the center of a storm of outrage. The retailer's number crunchers had come up with a statistical method for predicting which of its customers were most likely to become pregnant in the near future, giving Target's marketers a head start on pitching them baby products.
The model worked: Target (TGT) expanded its customer base for pregnancy and infant-care products by about 30%. But the media brouhaha, with everyone from The New York Times to Fox News accusing the company of "spying" on shoppers, took weeks to die down.
If Target's success at setting its sights on potential moms-to-be gives you the creeps, Eric Siegel's new book could ruin your whole day. Siegel is a former Columbia professor whose company, Predictive Impact, builds mathematical models that cull valuable nuggets of data from floods of raw information. Companies use the tools to forecast everything from what we'll shop for, to which movies we'll watch, to how likely we are to be in a car accident or default on our credit cards.
In Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie, or Die, Siegel explains how these models work and where the pitfalls are, in clear, colorful terms. Simply put, predictive analytics, or PA, is the science of learning from experience. Starting with data about the past and current behavior of a given group of people -- whether customers, patients, prison inmates up for parole, voters, or employees -- analysts can predict what they'll probably do next.
This kind of high-tech crystal ball is behind "the growing trend to make decisions more 'data driven,'" Siegel writes. "In fact, an organization that doesn't leverage its data in this way is like a person with a photographic memory who never bothers to think."
Predictive Analytics is packed with examples of how Citi (C), Facebook (FB), Ford (F), IBM (IBM), Google (GOOG), Netflix (NFLX), PayPal and many other businesses and government agencies have put PA to work. Pfizer (PFE), for instance, has a predictive model to foretell the likelihood that a patient will respond to a given new drug within three weeks. LinkedIn (LNKD) uses PA to pinpoint the fellow members you might want as connections. At the IRS, a mathematical ranking system applied to past tax returns "empowered IRS analysts to find 25 times more tax evasion, without increasing the number of investigations."
And then there's Hewlett-Packard (HPQ). A couple of years ago, alarmed by annual turnover rates in some divisions as high as 20%, HP decided to try anticipating which of its 330,000 employees worldwide were most likely to quit. Beginning with reams of data on things like salaries, raises, promotions, and job rotations, a team of analysts correlated that information with detailed employment records of people who had already left. Based on the similarities they found, the researchers assigned each current employee a Flight Risk score.
So far, the model seems to be helping to reduce turnover, but "some devoted HP workers are bound to be uncomfortable that their Flight Risk score exists," Siegel notes, adding that such tools represent "a whole new breed of powerful human resources data," which, since it's highly speculative, is either "insight or intrusion," depending on how managers use it.
Despite his status as a Big Data guru, Siegel echoes some of the same concerns as the pundits who squawked about Target. Calling predictive analytics "a tool that can serve both good and evil," he believes that widespread worries about privacy should not be dismissed.
The news and publishing industries are on no firmer ground than a year ago as the quest for a sustainable business model continues. What did we learn from 2012?
By Erika Fry, reporter
FORTUNE -- In a year with a highly contentious presidential election, the Olympics, and tragedy, after tragedy, after tragedy, you'd think 2012 would have been a banner year for American media. Not so. The media world is on MOREDec 28, 2012 5:00 AM ET
Some kinds of personal chitchat are just fine in a job interview, while other topics are best avoided. Here's how to tell the difference.
Dear Annie: I am applying for my dream job with a software company. So far, I've made it past the phone interview and a technical competency screening, and the next step is an in-person interview. I looked up this hiring manager on LinkedIn and noticed that we MOREAnne Fisher, contributor - Nov 1, 2012 11:20 AM ET
A good employee is hard to find - even in the age of Facebook and LinkedIn. Vetting for the top spot can be especially tough. Why reference checks fail, and how they can be fixed.
By Vickie Elmer, contributor
FORTUNE -- A few years ago several senior execs at Fortune 500 companies set up an online business. They hired a major executive-search firm to find a CEO for their startup, and MORESep 17, 2012 5:00 AM ET
The idea of job hunting in a town where you know no one (yet) is daunting, but laying some groundwork before you move can help. By Anne FisherAnne Fisher, contributor - Jun 29, 2012 10:00 AM ET
It's fine to sweat the details on your single biggest goal, but planning each step of the smaller stuff will just get in the way. By Anne FisherAnne Fisher, contributor - May 31, 2012 9:53 AM ET
Giving speeches at industry events is a time-tested way to get noticed by headhunters, but Twitter has made it more of a gamble. Luckily, you have other options. By Anne FisherAnne Fisher, contributor - May 11, 2012 10:34 AM ET
Now that hiring is starting to pick up, it may be worth trying again at companies where you applied in the past. Here's how to do it. By Anne FisherAnne Fisher, contributor - Apr 26, 2012 11:48 AM ET
Two-thirds of Facebook users between 18 and 29 do not include a single employer's name on their profiles, thwarting several big companies' efforts to use the network as a recruiting tool. By Vickie ElmerJan 13, 2012 9:32 AM ET
The blogosphere is buzzing over a pending lawsuit that raises the question: At what point do your tweets become company property?
By Anne Fisher, contributor
FORTUNE -- It all started routinely enough. Noah Kravitz signed on with mobile device and app review site PhoneDog in 2006, and began using a company Twitter account to keep techno-gadget enthusiasts au courant with his often quirky views on new products and industry trends.
Nothing unusual there: MOREJan 5, 2012 9:43 AM ET
|Bernanke's advice for college grads|
|The Winklevoss twins are Bitcoin bulls|
|Bloomberg's lazy Apple bias|
|Signs of new housing bubble in several areas|
|Prison exclusive: Bernie Madoff can't sleep|