On April 1, Tim Geithner, speaking from the big G20 love fest, told Katie Couric that he would certainly consider replacing the CEOs of any bailed-out entity that the administration felt wasn't performing up to snuff. I don't think there's anybody out there who doesn't think that's a good idea. You take the money. You do the job. If you don't, so long Charley, right? Right.
This will undoubtedly leave a huge CEO gap in a number of large institutions. In many cases, the government will probably try to fill the void with an executive who has been on the corporate scene before, as they did at General Motors. There's certainly a rationale for that. The anointed one knows the company in question. He has some experience in the trenches. At the same time, isn't that individual likely to be as much part of the problem as the solution? The Who said it: "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." Is that what we're really after?
I submit that there are many qualified individuals from outside each of these banks, car companies, insurance behemoths and other corporate states that are now at least partially owned by We, the People. I believe I am one of them.
Following are my qualifications to be a New Bailout CEO:
Of course, the compensation would have to make sense. I know the limits, which have been well-publicized. But what's the upside?
1. 59 yo-yos, purchased over a lifetime on the principle that they would accrue in value and eventually be collector's items, as indeed they are, in the sense that they seem to be of interest only to the person who collected them. Current value: $157 dollars.
2. Large portfolio of comic books circa 1966 - 2006, assembled after I found out that my mother had thrown away all my Silver Age MOREBing - Mar 26, 2009 10:13 AM ET
|AT&T cuts prices again|
|Can Fox's reboot of 'Cosmos' find an audience?|
|Ukraine crisis: Aid, sanctions and fallout|
|Winners and losers of the bull market|
|The medical marijuana ad that never aired, despite contrary media headlines|