By Elizabeth G. Olson
FORTUNE -- A new non-partisan report has set off a storm of dueling arguments over the perennially testy question of raising the minimum hourly wage.
The proposal, by Democrats, to raise the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would bring some 900,000 families above the poverty line and boost the income of an additional 16.5 million workers, but any such pay increase could also cost the jobs of as many as 500,000 workers, an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office found.
Almost as soon as the report was released Tuesday, opponents began to cite the report in an effort to torpedo any Congressional vote to hike the federal minimum from $7.25 per hour to $10.10 by 2016.
One such detractor was House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, who noted through a spokesman that, "While helping some, mandating higher wages has real costs, including fewer people working.
"With unemployment Americans' top concern, our focus should be creating -- not destroying -- jobs for those who need them most."
Supporters of the proposal rallied to defend the proposed wage increase, noting that an array of economic studies examining prior increases had established that job losses would be minimal.
"Zero is a perfectly reasonable estimate of the impact of the minimum wage on employment," said Jason Furman, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, in a conference call with reporters to respond to the CBO findings.
Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, one of 600 economists who signed a letter endorsing a rise in the minimum wage, said, on a separate conference call, that the CBO "has underestimated the benefits and overestimated the costs."
He and other economists on the call said the CBO report did not consider how additional wages will increase productivity and reduce turnover, absenteeism, and dependence on federal benefits.
"The cost," Stiglitz noted, "is typically passed on. And, yes, it does come at the expense of the upper-income individual, but they are doing well, and this only rectifies the inequality to a minor extent."
Overall, as many as 27.8 million workers could see more money in their pockets with a minimum wage rise because other workers who are already earning in the $10 range would likely receive boosts to their paychecks, the economists said.
President Obama initially supported a federal minimum age of $9 per hour, but has since backed the larger increase as Democrats seek to make the effort a campaign issue this fall.
The CBO analysis looked at the effects of both $9 and of $10.10 minimum wage, but concluded the lower amount would lift only 300,000 workers above the poverty line, but could result in 100,000 jobs being lopped off. The rise to $10.10 would bring three times as many workers out of poverty, but could translate into a loss of an estimated half-million jobs, according to the CBO.
The proposal is expected to face a vote in the Senate later this year, and may pass, but it will likely to be avoided by the Republican-dominated House.
Proposals to lift the minimum wage typically are fraught efforts as business owners, particularly those in the food industry, warn they will need to fire people to offset the higher salary requirements, and that customers will not pay higher prices to support the wage increases.
That's been accepted wisdom by many until higher-wage proponents began arguing that many low-wage workers rely on publicly financed benefits such as food stamps to make ends meet. Rallies have been held at fast-food outlets in a number of cities over the past year to highlight the connection between taxpayer subsidies and the lower wages companies pay.
Critics have argued that minimum-wage jobs are starter jobs held by teenagers for spending money, but recent studies have found that most of these workers are in their 30s, have children, and work full-time.
Skirmishes over raising the wage floor date back to 1938, when the first law was passed to set a minimum wage amount, and nearly every effort to raise it has brought accusations of government interference.
A Poets&Quants analysis of 2013 employment reports at most of the world's top business schools shows that there was no shortage of extraordinary pay days for the best and brightest MBA grads.Jan 28, 2014 9:51 AM ET
Even those who must wear special uniforms to go to work are not necessarily paid for their time. It all depends on their union agreements, and a recent Supreme Court ruling made that perfectly clear.
FORTUNE -- Wouldn't it be nice to get paid for getting dressed in the morning? After all, wearing proper attire is part of the job, right?
Fat chance. First off, if you're not putting on job-specific clothes MOREClaire Zillman, reporter - Jan 28, 2014 5:00 AM ET
The federal minimum wage for a tipped employee is $2.13 per hour -- a rate that's gone unchanged for 23 years.Claire Zillman, reporter - Jan 13, 2014 5:00 AM ET
As companies become flatter, moving up the organization chart keeps getting harder. Here are some thoughts on what to do now.Anne Fisher, contributor - Jan 3, 2014 5:00 AM ET
The publisher recently shuttered its program amid lawsuits over its practice of not paying interns. But internships -- particularly paid ones -- pay off for both job seekers and employers.
FORTUNE -- Condé Nast seems to have a serious case of sour grapes, and purple isn't even in season.
The magazine company that publishes titles like The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and Vogue has decided to shut down its internship program a mere MOREClaire Zillman, reporter - Oct 24, 2013 11:06 AM ET
Some 52% of families of cooks, servers, and other fast-food workers receive public aid, nearly twice the percentage of the overall workforce.Oct 16, 2013 9:39 AM ET
For several reasons, the SEC's proposed rule to address the growing CEO-average worker pay gap will not work as intended. Here's an alternative approach.Sep 27, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Maybe your latest raise hasn't got you breaking out the bubbly, but cheer up. It probably still beats what managers are getting in some other countries.Anne Fisher, contributor - Jul 30, 2013 11:37 AM ET
Former BofA employees have alleged that the bank paid bonuses to employees as a reward for taking actions that caused families to lose their homes. Where was the board during all of this?Eleanor Bloxham, CEO of The Value Alliance - Jul 1, 2013 1:18 PM ET
|GM raising Corvette prices|
|Albertsons to merge with Safeway|
|Boeing reports wing cracks on Dreamliners|
|Everything must go: There's a flood of store closings|
|Bitcoin matters. Ignore the media circus.|