FORTUNE -- It's hard to make waves anymore in the lavish realm of executive compensation, where shock value evaporated long ago. But Citigroup (C) did just that on Thursday when it increased the compensation of CEO Michael Corbat by an estimated 23%.
It wasn't the dollar amount that was so surprising. Corbat earned $14.1 million in 2013, up from $11.5 million in 2012. What was so puzzling was that it seemed that he'd done so little to deserve it.
The regulatory filing that revealed Corbat's compensation came about a month after Citigroup's reported fourth-quarter earnings in which profit jumped 21% but still missed analyst's estimates. Its earnings of $2.6 billion, or 82 cents a share, came up short of Wall Street's expectations, which had expected earnings of 95 cents a share. Revenue at the bank slipped 1%, to $17.8 billion. The latest earnings report closed out Corbat's first full year at the helm of the nation's third-largest bank. When he took the reins from Vikram Pandit in October 2012, Corbat promised to increase profitability and efficiency at the firm, which had become deeply entrenched in the morass of the Great Recession. If the fourth-quarter earnings are any indication, though, Corbat has yet to make good on those promises.
And while the idea in banking is that year-end bonuses, which typically account for the majority of exec pay, are bestowed based on an employee's performance, merit isn't the only thing that matters.
At the executive level, "there's explicit benchmarking that goes on. Banks consider how their [CEO] pay compares with other banks, like J.P Morgan, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America," says David Larcker, a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.
And this year, there was a race to keep with the going rate.
Earlier last week, Bank of America (BAC) boosted the compensation of CEO Brian Moynihan to $14 million, up 17% from last year. Jamie Dimon, CEO of J.P. Morgan (JPM), saw his pay jump a staggering 74% to $20 million, a year after the bank slashed his salary by more than 50% following big losses from the company's "London Whale" derivatives trade. Goldman Sachs (GS) awarded Lloyd Blankfein $23 million in total compensation in 2013, up 9.5% from 2012's sum. Morgan Stanley (MS), meanwhile, increased CEO James Gorman's salary to $4.9 million from $2.6 million, and boosted his stock bonus by a whopping 88%.
Keeping up with the market rate is key to attracting executive talent, but it matters just as much further down the corporate ladder. "However much you decide to pay the CEO, that will cascade through the organization," Larcker says. "We're looking at the CEO, but implicitly you're making a judgment with regard to [the pay of] people who will be reporting to the executive group."
There's no doubt that $14.1 million is a lot of money, but when you look at the types of compensation that make up that sum, it's not as extravagant as it seems.
Forty percent of Corbat's incentive award is cash, the rest is either deferred stock or performance share units, both of which are linked to the company's ability to meet financial and strategic goals. Citigroup's compensation committee adopted this pay structure after shareholders voted down the company's 2011 compensation arrangement.
"Most of this is some sort of long-term payout that depends on how the stock price performs. It's not, 'Bang! Here's the money,'" Larcker says. "[The board] is posing risk on the guy. It's worth pointing out that those pay units could be worth anything eventually -- they could be worth zero."
Citigroup owns the parent company of the firm that is doling out the settlement checks.Eleanor Bloxham, CEO of The Value Alliance - Aug 5, 2013 11:28 AM ET
Given the concerning revolving door between the SEC and banks like Citigroup, it's important that the settlement between the two is put aside and the case goes to trial.Eleanor Bloxham, CEO of The Value Alliance - Feb 19, 2013 5:00 AM ET
Amid reports that the SEC is investigating Vikram Pandit's departure from Citigroup, the bank's board needs to take a very close look at how it shares information with shareholders and the public.
FORTUNE -- Is the SEC investigating former CEO Vikram Pandit's departure from Citigroup?
The regulator wouldn't comment on the issue for this article, but that's what Fox Business reported last Tuesday. The issue, according to Fox's reporting, is around the timing MOREEleanor Bloxham, CEO of The Value Alliance - Oct 29, 2012 10:20 AM ET
Directors must seize control of CEO selection and pursue the task in a way that's fundamentally new at most companies. Here are a few of the most critical steps boards need to take. By Ram CharanAug 8, 2012 12:54 PM ET
The bank's woes are only growing., As Sandy Weill recommends, the company should be split in two. By Eleanor BloxhamEleanor Bloxham, CEO of The Value Alliance - Jul 26, 2012 11:57 AM ET
Both the SEC and Citi now stand accused of failing to disclose relevant information, whether it's to customers in Citi's case or, as with the SEC, to the public. By Eleanor BloxhamJan 6, 2012 11:49 AM ET
Instead of defending its rejected $285 million settlement with Citigroup, the SEC should take a page from the Enron playbook and consider pursuing individual officers. By Eleanor BloxhamDec 2, 2011 3:48 PM ET
The rejection of the proposed settlement between the SEC and Citigroup should send a message to regulators and companies that it's time to keep the public in mind. By Eleanor BloxhamNov 30, 2011 10:51 AM ET
If big banks get to settle with the SEC without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, what good does a settlement do in the end? By Eleanor BloxhamNov 7, 2011 10:05 AM ET
|Delinquent IRS employees paid bonuses by the agency|
|Court quizzes Aereo: Do TV streams break the law?|
|Premarkets: Waiting for big tech earnings|
|Gun silencer sales are booming|
|How women can narrow the 'confidence gap'|